Skip to content
Politics
Breeze in Busan

Why Do People Prefer to Live in Unequal Societies? A Psychological Perspective

Inequality is a persistent problem in many societies, with some individuals and groups enjoying greater resources, opportunities, and privileges than others. However, despite the numerous negative effects of inequality, such as reduced well-being and increased conflict, many people still prefer to live in unequal societies. A recent study published in the British Journal of Psychology sought to explore why people prefer to live in unequal societies. The study found that individuals have a psych

By Maru Kim
Feb 4, 2023
Updated: Feb 7, 2025
2 min read
Share Story
Why Do People Prefer to Live in Unequal Societies? A Psychological Perspective

Inequality is a persistent problem in many societies, with some individuals and groups enjoying greater resources, opportunities, and privileges than others. However, despite the numerous negative effects of inequality, such as reduced well-being and increased conflict, many people still prefer to live in unequal societies.

A recent study published in the British Journal of Psychology sought to explore why people prefer to live in unequal societies. The study found that individuals have a psychological preference for inequality, as they associate it with social status and success. In this article, we will delve deeper into the results of this study and the implications it has for our understanding of why people prefer to live in unequal societies.

Participants' Preferences for Unequal Societies

The study participants were presented with a scenario in which they had the choice to live in a society with equal distribution of resources or one with unequal distribution of resources. The results showed that the majority of participants chose the society with unequal distribution, as they believed it would provide them with greater opportunities for social mobility and success.

Desire for Power and Status

The researchers also found that people who chose the unequal society had a higher desire for power and status. These individuals believed that in an unequal society, they would have a greater chance of rising to the top and enjoying the benefits of being in a higher social class. This preference for unequal societies may be driven by a desire for power and status, as individuals believe they will have a greater chance of achieving these goals in a society with unequal distribution of resources.

Value of Fairness and Equality

On the other hand, those who chose the equal society valued fairness and equality. These individuals believed that everyone would have the same chances for success in an equal society, regardless of their social status or background. They were motivated by a desire for a fair and just society, where everyone has equal opportunities and resources.

Implications for Our Understanding of Inequality

The results of this study provide important insights into why people prefer to live in unequal societies. It suggests that people's desires for social mobility and success are powerful motivators for choosing to live in unequal societies. However, it is important to note that while people may have a psychological preference for inequality, this does not mean that they condone unequal treatment of others. The study highlights the need for further research to understand the complex relationship between people's desires for success and their views on equality and fairness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study published in the British Journal of Psychology sheds light on why people prefer to live in unequal societies. The results suggest that people's desires for social mobility and success drive their preference for unequal societies, but further research is needed to understand the full picture. It is clear that while people may have a psychological preference for inequality, this does not necessarily mean that they support unequal treatment of others. The study highlights the importance of understanding the psychological factors that drive people's preferences for unequal societies, in order to better address the issue of inequality and promote more just and equal societies.

Related Topics

Share This Story

Knowledge is most valuable when shared with the community.

Editorial Context

"Independent journalism relies on radical transparency. View our full log of editorial notes, corrections, and project dispatches in the Newsroom Transparency Log."

Reader Pulse

The report's impact signal

0 SIGNALS

Be the first to provide a reading pulse. These collective signals help our newsroom understand the impact of our reporting.

Join the deep discussion
Loading this week's participation brief

Join the discussion

Article Discussion

A more thoughtful conversation, anchored to the story

Atlantic-style discussion for this article. One-level replies, editor prompts, and moderation-first participation are now powered directly by Prisma.

Discussion Status

Open

Please sign in to join the discussion.

Loading discussion...

The Weekly Breeze

Independent reporting and analysis on Busan,
Korea, and the broader regional economy.

Independent journalism, directly to your inbox.

Related Coverage

Continue with related reporting

Follow adjacent reporting from the same newsroom file, with linked coverage that extends the current story's desk and context.

When Conservatism Loses Its Philosophy
NewsMay 21, 2026

When Conservatism Loses Its Philosophy

A Starbucks scandal over Gwangju memory exposed a deeper crisis in South Korea’s right: a movement struggling to defend the institutions it claims to conserve.

Continue this story

More on this issue

Stay with the same issue through adjacent reporting that carries the argument, context, or consequences forward.

Busan’s Merger Debate Starts in the West
NewsMay 20, 2026

Busan’s Merger Debate Starts in the West

For decades, West Busan has carried Busan’s largest development promises. A merger or mega-region would matter only if it gave the city’s western districts and neighboring Gyeongnam cities the authority, money and accountability to function as one urban region.

The Cheap Alliance Era Is Over
NewsApr 24, 2026

The Cheap Alliance Era Is Over

The alliance must remain the core, but it can no longer be the whole architecture. That is where multilateralism stops being a slogan and starts becoming a hedge, giving Seoul more room to absorb shocks from Washington without weakening deterrence.

More from the author

Continue with Breeze in Busan

Stay with the same line of reporting through more work from this byline.