Skip to content
Politics
Breeze in Busan

US Courts' Conflicting Mifepristone Rulings Reflect Ongoing Abortion Law Struggle in South Korea

The Biden administration has requested clarification from a judge regarding how the federal government should comply with two conflicting court orders on the abortion pill mifepristone. The rulings, issued on Friday by judges in Amarillo, Texas, and Spokane, Washington, have created legal uncertainty over the drug's status. Mifepristone is used in over half of all abortions nationwide and is also employed in managing miscarriages. Meanwhile, legal abortion in South Korea remains a controversial

By Maru Kim
Apr 12, 2023
Updated: Feb 7, 2025
2 min read
Share Story
US Courts' Conflicting Mifepristone Rulings Reflect Ongoing Abortion Law Struggle in South Korea

The Biden administration has requested clarification from a judge regarding how the federal government should comply with two conflicting court orders on the abortion pill mifepristone. The rulings, issued on Friday by judges in Amarillo, Texas, and Spokane, Washington, have created legal uncertainty over the drug's status. Mifepristone is used in over half of all abortions nationwide and is also employed in managing miscarriages.

Meanwhile, legal abortion in South Korea remains a controversial and complicated issue, despite a landmark ruling by the Constitutional Court in 2019 that decriminalized the procedure. The court ruled that banning abortion in the early stages of pregnancy violated the right to self-determination, but lawmakers have yet to agree on a legal definition for the "early stages of pregnancy." As a result, women seeking to terminate their pregnancies must navigate a fine line between what is considered legal and illegal. Although only around 3,000 "legal" surgical abortions are performed in the country each year, the total number is believed to be significantly higher.

Abortion was officially decriminalized in South Korea in 2021 following the Constitutional Court's ruling in 2019 that declared making abortion a criminal offense was unconstitutional. The court ordered the legislature to revise the laws by the end of 2020, but the National Assembly failed to take action. Consequently, the anti-abortion law was nullified at the beginning of 2021, making abortion no longer a crime in the country. However, confusion persists regarding how, when, or where abortions can be obtained, and the government must do more to provide clarity and support for those in need of the procedure.

Back in the United States, the legal turmoil created by the rival decisions on mifepristone may require resolution by the Supreme Court, which eliminated the constitutional right to abortion 10 months ago. Kacsmaryk's ruling marks the first time a court has invalidated an FDA drug approval, and if it takes effect, selling mifepristone would become a criminal offense nationwide.

The administration has chosen to work through the appeals process for now, rather than ignoring the ruling, as some prominent Democrats and at least one Republican have suggested. The Justice Department filed a 49-page emergency motion on Monday, asking the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to keep Kacsmaryk's ruling on hold, arguing that it would cause irreparable harm to patients, healthcare systems, and businesses if allowed to take effect.

Related Topics

Share This Story

Knowledge is most valuable when shared with the community.

Editorial Context

"Independent journalism relies on radical transparency. View our full log of editorial notes, corrections, and project dispatches in the Newsroom Transparency Log."

Reader Pulse

The report's impact signal

0 SIGNALS

Be the first to provide a reading pulse. These collective signals help our newsroom understand the impact of our reporting.

Join the deep discussion
Loading this week's participation brief

Join the discussion

Article Discussion

A more thoughtful conversation, anchored to the story

Atlantic-style discussion for this article. One-level replies, editor prompts, and moderation-first participation are now powered directly by Prisma.

Discussion Status

Open

Please sign in to join the discussion.

Loading discussion...

The Weekly Breeze

Independent reporting and analysis on Busan,
Korea, and the broader regional economy.

Independent journalism, directly to your inbox.

Related Coverage

Continue with related reporting

Follow adjacent reporting from the same newsroom file, with linked coverage that extends the current story's desk and context.

When Conservatism Loses Its Philosophy
NewsMay 21, 2026

When Conservatism Loses Its Philosophy

A Starbucks scandal over Gwangju memory exposed a deeper crisis in South Korea’s right: a movement struggling to defend the institutions it claims to conserve.

Continue this story

More on this issue

Stay with the same issue through adjacent reporting that carries the argument, context, or consequences forward.

Busan’s Merger Debate Starts in the West
NewsMay 20, 2026

Busan’s Merger Debate Starts in the West

For decades, West Busan has carried Busan’s largest development promises. A merger or mega-region would matter only if it gave the city’s western districts and neighboring Gyeongnam cities the authority, money and accountability to function as one urban region.

The Cheap Alliance Era Is Over
NewsApr 24, 2026

The Cheap Alliance Era Is Over

The alliance must remain the core, but it can no longer be the whole architecture. That is where multilateralism stops being a slogan and starts becoming a hedge, giving Seoul more room to absorb shocks from Washington without weakening deterrence.

More from the author

Continue with Breeze in Busan

Stay with the same line of reporting through more work from this byline.