Breeze in Busan

Independent journalism on the politics, economy, and society shaping Busan.

Contact channels

News Tips

[email protected]

Partnerships

[email protected]

Contribute

[email protected]

Information

[email protected]

Explore

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Busan News
  • National News
  • Authors
  • About
  • Editor
  • Contact

Contribute

  • Send News
  • Contact
  • Join Team
  • Collaborate

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Editorial Policy
  • Correction & Rebuttal

Newsroom Details

30, Hasinbeonyeong-ro 151beon-gil, Saha-gu, Busan, Korea

+82 507-1311-4503

Busan 아00471

Registered: 2022.11.16

Publisher·Editor: Maru Kim

Juvenile Protection: Maru Kim

© 2026 Breeze in Busan. All Rights Reserved.

Independent reporting from Busan across politics, economy, society, and national affairs.

national-news
Breeze in Busan

The Ships for America Act: Challenges and Opportunities for South Korea

The Ships for America Act, introduced in December 2024, signifies a transformative effort by the United States to reclaim its long-diminished shipbuilding industry. The act represents an ambitious attempt to rebuild the capacity of U.S. shipyards, expand the nation’s maritime workforce, and strengthen national security by reducing reliance on foreign-built ships. While the act’s immediate focus lies in domestic revitalization, its broader implications resonate across the global shipbuilding indu

Dec 21, 2024
4 min read
Save
Share
Maru Kim

Maru Kim

Editor-in-Chief

Maru Kim, Editor-in-Chief and Publisher, is dedicated to providing insightful and captivating stories that resonate with both local and global audiences.

The Ships for America Act: Challenges and Opportunities for South Korea

The Ships for America Act, introduced in December 2024, signifies a transformative effort by the United States to reclaim its long-diminished shipbuilding industry. The act represents an ambitious attempt to rebuild the capacity of U.S. shipyards, expand the nation’s maritime workforce, and strengthen national security by reducing reliance on foreign-built ships. While the act’s immediate focus lies in domestic revitalization, its broader implications resonate across the global shipbuilding industry, particularly for South Korea. As a global leader in shipbuilding, South Korea faces the dual challenge of adapting to the competitive pressures stemming from the act while exploring opportunities for collaboration with the United States.

The United States has long struggled with a declining shipbuilding industry, characterized by aging infrastructure, reduced competitiveness, and a significant loss of skilled labor. The SHIPS Act seeks to address these vulnerabilities through tax incentives, workforce development programs, and strategic investments in modernization. Specifically, the act introduces a 25 percent tax credit for shipyard upgrades and a 33 percent credit for vessel construction and retrofitting, providing substantial financial support to attract investment in U.S. shipyards. Additionally, the establishment of a U.S. Center for Maritime Innovation signals the country’s intent to foster advancements in ship design, green technologies, and autonomous systems. These measures collectively aim to position the United States as a competitive player in global shipbuilding markets while simultaneously securing its supply chains and enhancing logistical capacity for military operations.

For South Korea, the SHIPS Act represents a critical moment in its maritime trajectory. South Korea has long dominated the global shipbuilding industry, excelling in high-value vessels such as LNG carriers, ultra-large crude oil tankers, and eco-friendly ships powered by hydrogen and ammonia. Companies like Hyundai Heavy Industries, Samsung Heavy Industries, and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering have become synonymous with innovation and efficiency, capturing significant shares of the global market. However, the competitive landscape is shifting. In 2023, South Korea’s share of global shipbuilding orders dropped to 24 percent, an eight-year low, while China captured 59 percent of orders through aggressive pricing strategies and state subsidies. The SHIPS Act introduces another dimension to this evolving landscape, as the United States seeks to re-establish itself as a maritime powerhouse.

The competitive pressure from the SHIPS Act is particularly evident in its protectionist provisions. By mandating that government-funded cargoes be transported on U.S.-flagged vessels, the act effectively limits opportunities for foreign-built ships, including those from South Korea, to participate in American logistics networks. Furthermore, the act’s focus on localizing production incentivizes South Korean companies to establish operations within the United States if they wish to maintain access to this lucrative market. This structural shift challenges South Korea’s traditional approach to supplying advanced ships globally and forces its shipbuilders to adapt their strategies in response to evolving market conditions.

Despite these challenges, the SHIPS Act also creates significant opportunities for collaboration between South Korea and the United States. The U.S. shipbuilding sector, while ambitious in its goals, lacks the capacity and expertise to quickly meet the act’s targets, particularly in high-value and technologically complex vessels. This gap presents a pathway for South Korea to position itself as a strategic partner. Its leadership in green technologies, such as ammonia-powered ships and LNG dual-fuel propulsion systems, aligns closely with the sustainability goals outlined in the SHIPS Act. By exporting these technologies or entering joint ventures with U.S. shipyards, South Korean firms can contribute to the act’s success while securing their influence in a key market.

However, such collaborations are not without risks. The possibility of technology transfer through partnerships poses a significant threat to South Korea’s competitive advantage. Proprietary innovations in automated shipbuilding processes and green propulsion systems, which form the backbone of South Korea’s industry, could be at risk of appropriation in collaborative projects. Ensuring robust intellectual property protections and negotiating clear terms in joint ventures will be essential for South Korea to mitigate these risks while engaging with the U.S. shipbuilding ecosystem.

The geopolitical context of the SHIPS Act further complicates South Korea’s position. The act is part of a broader U.S. strategy to counterbalance China’s maritime dominance, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. A robust U.S.-flagged fleet and modernized shipbuilding capacity are critical to maintaining supply chain resilience and ensuring military mobility in this strategic theater. For South Korea, as a close U.S. ally, this dynamic creates both opportunities for deeper security collaboration and potential tensions with China, which remains South Korea’s largest trading partner. Navigating this delicate balance will require South Korea to carefully align its economic and strategic interests.

To adapt to the challenges posed by the SHIPS Act, South Korea must adopt a proactive and diversified strategy. Strengthening its leadership in green shipbuilding technologies is paramount. Continued investment in research and development will ensure that South Korea remains at the forefront of innovation, making its expertise indispensable even as competitors emerge. Additionally, South Korea should consider strategic investments in U.S.-based shipyards, enabling its companies to comply with domestic production requirements while influencing the development of the American shipbuilding sector. Expanding its global market reach beyond traditional strongholds will also be crucial. By diversifying into emerging markets in Southeast Asia, Europe, and the Middle East, South Korea can mitigate risks associated with U.S. protectionist policies.

The Ships for America Act represents a watershed moment not only for the United States but also for the global shipbuilding industry. For South Korea, it encapsulates the dual realities of competition and collaboration in an increasingly interconnected world. While the act challenges South Korea’s market dominance, it also opens new pathways for partnership and innovation. By leveraging its strengths, protecting its technological edge, and navigating the geopolitical landscape with agility, South Korea can turn these challenges into opportunities for sustained global leadership. As the maritime sector continues to evolve, the decisions made in response to the SHIPS Act will shape the future of global shipbuilding for decades to come.

The Weekly Breeze

Keep pace with Busan's deep narratives.
Delivered every Monday morning.

Independent journalism, directly to your inbox.

Strategic Partner
Breeze Editorial
Elevate Your
Brand's Narrative

Connect your core values with a community of
thoughtful and discerning readers.

Inquire Now
Related Topics
National News

Share This Story

Knowledge is most valuable when shared with the community.

💬 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

    Related Coverage

    Continue with related reporting

    Follow adjacent reporting from the same newsroom file, with linked coverage that extends the current story's desk and context.

    Abolishing South Korea’s Prosecution Service May Not End Prosecutorial Power
    Mar 11, 2026

    Abolishing South Korea’s Prosecution Service May Not End Prosecutorial Power

    Draft laws to abolish the prosecution service promise a historic break with concentrated prosecutorial power, but unresolved warrant authority, supplemental investigation rules and inter-agency transfer mechanisms could preserve old leverage in a new legal structure.

    When Judicial Language Obscures Legal Reasoning
    Feb 20, 2026

    When Judicial Language Obscures Legal Reasoning

    As court decisions circulate through digital research systems and shape future precedent, disciplined reasoning becomes more than professional habit. It becomes a condition of institutional reliability.

    Why the Winter Olympics Feels Less Visible in South Korea
    Feb 4, 2026

    Why the Winter Olympics Feels Less Visible in South Korea

    Exclusive broadcasting rights, failed sublicensing talks, and the limits of universal access rules have reshaped how the Games reach the public.

    More from the author

    Continue with the author

    Stay with the same line of reporting through more work from this byline.

    Who Learns From War
    Mar 5, 2026

    Who Learns From War

    Can South Korea Prevent AI From Becoming an Elite Monopoly?
    Feb 25, 2026

    Can South Korea Prevent AI From Becoming an Elite Monopoly?