Busan, South Korea – The city of Busan is pursuing an ambitious urban transformation through its Special Architectural Zone initiative. Marketed as a key step in becoming a “Global Hub City,” this project enlists world-renowned architects to introduce creative designs into Busan’s skyline. From October 16 to 18, the designs for six candidate sites will be unveiled at Busan City Hall, while presentations will also be streamed online. Yet, as the city aims to enhance its international appeal, there are growing concerns about the project’s impact on local communities and whether it truly serves the needs of all residents.
The Special Architectural Zone designation allows certain areas to benefit from relaxed regulations, aimed at fostering innovation and striking urban architecture. In theory, this approach enables bold designs that could revitalize Busan’s image on the global stage. However, in practice, it raises questions about who benefits most from these changes and whether the focus on cutting-edge aesthetics is detracting from addressing more pressing local needs.
The redevelopment of Samik Beach Town, located in the Namcheon 2 redevelopment zone, illustrates this tension vividly. If selected as a final site, the plan to build a 90-story tower by Dominique Perrault Architecture (DPA) would drastically alter the Gwangalli Beach skyline, turning the area into a striking symbol of modernity. But does building one of the city’s tallest structures truly serve the interests of the broader community, or does it cater primarily to developers and affluent buyers? As one of the most prominent projects, it highlights the risk of prioritizing visually appealing structures over inclusive urban planning.
Six Projects with Varied Impacts
Among the six proposals, each project aims to address different urban needs, yet the focus leans heavily towards tourism and luxury developments. MVRDV’s Nampo Harbor Town seeks to revive Nampo-dong with a blend of residential, commercial, and lodging spaces. The design promises economic revitalization, but at what cost to the affordability and accessibility of the area? The area’s transformation risks sidelining long-time residents as property values rise, making it less accessible for those who call Nampo-dong home.
Similarly, the Yongdugol Complex by 2Portzamparc and the Mi-po Oceanside Hotel by OMA promise to boost Busan’s status as a business and tourist destination. These developments could attract investment and visitors, but the focus on creating upscale environments may sideline urgent needs like affordable housing and community spaces. Tourist-driven projects can provide short-term economic boosts, yet they do little to solve the housing challenges facing local residents.
In contrast, the Yeongdo Collective Hills project, also by MVRDV, takes a more community-focused approach, aiming for a smaller-scale integration with the local landscape. While commendable in its intent to preserve the area’s character, it remains an outlier in a lineup dominated by high-rise and luxury developments.
The largest proposal, the Namcheon Redevelopment, aims to modernize outdated housing infrastructure, replacing 33 existing buildings with new towers. Yet, while it seeks to address the city’s housing needs, the planned scale of 99 stories raises questions about whether it will result in the displacement of long-term residents and a shift in the area’s character. The risk of gentrification looms large, with increased property values potentially pushing out those who have called the neighborhood home for decades.
Is Public Engagement Enough?
Busan’s emphasis on public engagement, with opportunities for residents to attend presentations and view the designs at City Hall, suggests a commitment to transparency. Yet, the rapid closure of registration—filling up in just 10 minutes—raises questions about how genuinely inclusive this process is. Can the city truly claim to have captured the voices of all stakeholders when so many were unable to participate?
For meaningful public involvement, it is essential that the concerns of local residents, especially those who will be directly affected by these projects, are heard and integrated into the decision-making process. Without this, the initiative risks being seen as a top-down project that prioritizes the interests of developers and architects over those of the broader community.
Economic Gains vs. Social Equity
As the city anticipates the October 22 announcement of the winning designs, the broader implications of this initiative must be carefully considered. While the project could boost Busan’s global reputation and attract new investments, the potential downsides cannot be ignored. Luxury high-rises and tourist-centric developments may bring in short-term gains, but if they lead to greater social and economic divides, the long-term costs could outweigh these benefits.
The redevelopment of Samik Beach Town into a towering symbol of modernity may enhance the city’s skyline, but it also risks creating a cityscape that caters to the wealthy at the expense of inclusivity. Increased property values, rising living costs, and the possible displacement of long-time residents paint a worrying picture of a city that is transforming for some, but not for all.
Urban Growth or Urban Divide?
Looking beyond the sleek designs and bold visions presented in these architectural proposals reveals deeper questions about the real impact on the ground. The Special Architectural Zone initiative offers an exciting vision of Busan’s future, yet it also raises crucial questions about equity, inclusivity, and the real beneficiaries of this transformation.
Ultimately, the success of Busan’s initiative should not be measured solely by its new landmarks or the influx of tourists but by its ability to create a city that is truly for everyone. Busan must strive to ensure that this transformation leads to a vibrant, equitable urban environment, where progress is shared across all layers of society. Only then can the city’s bold vision align with the needs and hopes of all its residents, not just the fortunate few.
