Skip to content
Busan news
Breeze in Busan

Busan’s Global City Ranking Sparks Debate: Success or Oversight?

Busan, South Korea’s dynamic port city, has been ranked 67th in the 2024 World’s Best Cities report by Resonance Consultancy, marking its debut on this prestigious global list. While the ranking has been celebrated by city officials as a significant achievement, it has also sparked debate over whether it truly reflects Busan's current state and future potential. The ranking, seen by some as a major milestone, is viewed by others as an overstatement that may obscure the city’s underlying challeng

By Maru Kim
Aug 15, 2024
Updated: Feb 7, 2025
3 min read
Share Story
Busan’s Global City Ranking Sparks Debate: Success or Oversight?

Busan, South Korea’s dynamic port city, has been ranked 67th in the 2024 World’s Best Cities report by Resonance Consultancy, marking its debut on this prestigious global list. While the ranking has been celebrated by city officials as a significant achievement, it has also sparked debate over whether it truly reflects Busan's current state and future potential. The ranking, seen by some as a major milestone, is viewed by others as an overstatement that may obscure the city’s underlying challenges.

The 2024 World’s Best Cities report, which evaluates over 270 global cities based on criteria such as livability, economic vitality, and cultural vibrancy, highlighted several factors that contributed to Busan’s inclusion in the top 100. The report praised Busan for its blend of natural beauty and modern infrastructure, noting the city's low poverty rate and its emerging status as a "bleisure" destination—a place where business and leisure coexist harmoniously.

Busan’s role as a major container port and its growing reputation as a hub for international events and cultural activities were also emphasized. The report described Busan as "South Korea’s summer capital" and likened it to Miami, underscoring its appeal to both domestic and international travelers. Additionally, the city’s forward-thinking initiatives, such as the ‘Oceanics Busan’ project—the world’s first maritime smart city—were cited as examples of its innovative approach to urban development.

Busan Mayor Park Heong-joon expressed pride in the city’s ranking, stating, “This recognition brings immense joy, and we are committed to sustaining our efforts to keep Busan in the global spotlight and continue its development.” The city’s leadership has positioned the ranking as a validation of Busan’s growing global profile and a testament to its efforts to attract more tourists and investors.

Criticism and Concerns

Despite the celebratory tone from city officials, the ranking has not been without its critics. Some argue that while the ranking is a positive indicator, it may not fully capture the complexities of Busan’s current situation. The comparison to Miami, for instance, has been met with skepticism. While both cities share a coastal identity and are known for their tourism sectors, critics argue that this comparison oversimplifies Busan’s broader economic and cultural significance. Unlike Miami, Busan is a vital industrial and economic hub with a rich history and a central role in South Korea's economy. The comparison may fail to recognize the city's full potential and its distinct identity beyond being a tourist destination.

Moreover, the gap between Busan and Seoul’s rankings—Seoul being ranked 10th—has raised questions about Busan’s competitive positioning within South Korea and the broader Asian region. Seoul’s strong showing underscores its global influence and dynamic urban environment, while Busan’s lower ranking suggests there is significant room for improvement. Critics have pointed out that, despite the city’s strengths, Busan continues to struggle with issues such as income inequality and a lower overall income level compared to other major South Korean cities. This discrepancy raises concerns about whether the ranking truly reflects the lived realities of Busan’s residents.

Furthermore, some local voices have expressed doubts about whether the ranking accurately reflects the city’s long-term prospects. While the report highlights Busan’s low poverty rate as a key factor in its ranking, there is a concern that it may overlook deeper socio-economic challenges. Critics argue that the city government should focus on addressing these underlying issues, such as economic diversification and improving infrastructure, rather than merely celebrating the ranking.

Implications for Busan’s Future

The 2024 World’s Best Cities ranking should serve as both a recognition of Busan’s achievements and a call to action for its future development. While the ranking provides a platform for promoting Busan on the global stage, it also underscores the need for the city to critically assess its current strategies and address areas where it still lags behind its regional and global peers.

For Busan to climb higher in future rankings, it will be essential for city leaders to focus on sustainable growth, enhancing the quality of life for residents, and boosting the city’s economic diversity. This includes addressing income disparities, improving public services, and ensuring that the city’s infrastructure can support its growing population and attract more international businesses.

In conclusion, while Busan’s inclusion in the 2024 World’s Best Cities report is a noteworthy accomplishment, it also highlights the challenges that lie ahead. As Busan continues to grow and evolve, city leaders will need to balance celebrating the city’s successes with a clear-eyed assessment of its challenges. Only by addressing these issues head-on can Busan truly secure its place among the world’s best cities in the years to come.

Related Topics

Share This Story

Knowledge is most valuable when shared with the community.

Editorial Context

"Independent journalism relies on radical transparency. View our full log of editorial notes, corrections, and project dispatches in the Newsroom Transparency Log."

Reader Pulse

The report's impact signal

0 SIGNALS

Be the first to provide a reading pulse. These collective signals help our newsroom understand the impact of our reporting.

Join the deep discussion
Loading this week's participation brief

Join the discussion

Article Discussion

A more thoughtful conversation, anchored to the story

Atlantic-style discussion for this article. One-level replies, editor prompts, and moderation-first participation are now powered directly by Prisma.

Discussion Status

Open

Please sign in to join the discussion.

Loading discussion...

The Weekly Breeze

Independent reporting and analysis on Busan,
Korea, and the broader regional economy.

Independent journalism, directly to your inbox.

Related Coverage

Continue with related reporting

Follow adjacent reporting from the same newsroom file, with linked coverage that extends the current story's desk and context.

What Busan’s tourism rebound does not fix
NewsApr 23, 2026

What Busan’s tourism rebound does not fix

Visitors are back, but the sectors that give the city economic depth remain under pressure — leaving Busan busier on the surface and more exposed underneath.

Continue this story

More on this issue

Stay with the same issue through adjacent reporting that carries the argument, context, or consequences forward.

Can Smart Monitoring Change an Aging Industrial Complex in Busan?
NewsApr 16, 2026

Can Smart Monitoring Change an Aging Industrial Complex in Busan?

At Seobusan Smart Valley, Busan is trying to use an integrated control system to manage the risks of an older industrial complex. Whether that becomes a working public-safety tool or a technology showcase will depend on results the city has yet to prove.

Busan’s Two Futures
NewsApr 13, 2026

Busan’s Two Futures

Busan is aging, losing younger residents, and struggling to sustain confidence in North Port, its flagship waterfront project. With World Design Capital 2028, the city is trying to show that visible ambition can still produce real urban renewal.

More from the author

Continue with Breeze in Busan

Stay with the same line of reporting through more work from this byline.